Comparing Nose-Throat Swabs and Nasopharyngeal Aspirates Collected From Children With Symptoms for Respiratory Virus Identification Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 122 (3), e615-e620
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0691
Abstract
The objective of this study was to calculate sensitivity values for the detection of major respiratory viruses of childhood by using combined nose-throat swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates. Children who had symptoms and presented to a pediatric teaching hospital and had a diagnostic respiratory specimen collected were enrolled, and paired nose-throat swab and nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens were collected. Parents were asked to collect the nose-throat swab specimen in the first instance but could defer to a health care worker if unwilling. Nose-throat swab collectors were asked to rate perceived quality of collection. All nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected by a health care worker by using a standard protocol. Real-time polymerase chain reaction for 8 respiratory viruses was performed in our hospital's diagnostic laboratory. Paired nose-throat swab/nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens were collected during 303 illnesses, with at least 1 respiratory virus identified in 186 (61%). For the major pathogens of childhood, influenza A virus and respiratory syncytial virus, collection by using the nose-throat swab had a sensitivity of 91.9% and 93.1%, respectively. A health care worker collected 219 (72%) of the nose-throat swab specimens; concordance with the nasopharyngeal aspirate was not related to health care worker collection or perceived quality of collection. Nose-throat swab specimens, in combination with sensitive molecular testing, are a less invasive diagnostic respiratory specimen with adequate sensitivity for use in the clinic and hospital outpatient settings and large-scale community studies through parent collection. For children who present to a hospital in which an avian or pandemic strain of influenza virus is reasonably part of the differential diagnosis, nasopharyngeal aspirates or a similar collection technique (eg, nasal washes) should continue to be used.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The cost of community-managed viral respiratory illnesses in a cohort of healthy preschool-aged childrenRespiratory Research, 2008
- Community Epidemiology of Human Metapneumovirus, Human Coronavirus NL63, and Other Respiratory Viruses in Healthy Preschool-Aged Children Using Parent-Collected SpecimensPediatrics, 2007
- Comparison of Results of Detection of Rhinovirus by PCR and Viral Culture in Human Nasal Wash Specimens from Subjects with and without Clinical Symptoms of Respiratory IllnessJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemicNature, 2006
- Viral specimen collection by parents increases response rate in population-based virus studiesJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2006
- Sequence variation can affect the performance of minor groove binder TaqMan probes in viral diagnostic assaysJournal of Clinical Virology, 2006
- A 5′-nuclease real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of a broad range of influenza A subtypes, including H5N1Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 2005
- RSV testing in bronchiolitis: which nasal sampling method is best?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2005
- Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for Detection of Human Metapneumoviruses from All Known Genetic LineagesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mycoplasma genitalium in first-void urine specimens by multiplex polymerase chain reactionMolecular Diagnosis, 1997