Infection control and prevention strategies in the ICU
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 20 (S4), S7-S11
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01713976
Abstract
Although only 5–10% of all hospitalized patients are treated in ICUs, they account for approximately 25% of all nosocomial infections, and the incidence of nosocomial infections in ICUs is 5–10 times higher than that observed in general hospital wards. Systemic and respiratory infections are far more common than in general wards, and most epidemics originate, in ICUs. Nosocomial infections are the primary focus of most infection control programmes because they are the cause of high mortality rates in ICUs. Effective programmes are usually based on the cooperation of the intensive care physician, the infectious disease specialist, the microbiologist and the clinical epidemiologist. The infectious disease specialist develops specific guidelines for the antimicrobial therapy of typical infections which minimize the selective pressure for microorganisms within the ICU. The microbiologist provides rapid and accurate diagnosis of the pathogens involved. The clinical epidemiologist identifies epidemics at early stages, using epidemiological tools and molecular typing methods, as well as summarizing trends of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and setting standards for isolation practices. A simple and inexpensive way to reduce nosocomial infections in ICUs is to ensure that staff disinfect their hands after dealing with a patient. Intravascular devices, mechanical ventilation and urinary catheterization are major risk factors for nosocomial infections, and their use should be evaluated daily and discontinued as soon as clinically possible. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract and the use of standard immunoglobulin for prophylaxis are still controversial and need further investigation. The use of monoclonal antibodies, such as anti-endotoxin antibodies, has failed to improve the prognosis in the critically ill septic patient. Today, the major infectious threat to ICU patients is the increase in multiply-resistant microor-ganisms: methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus, enterococci andCandida spp. in particular.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Probable Transmission via Hands of a Health Care WorkerClinical Infectious Diseases, 1993
- A Controlled Trial of Scheduled Replacement of Central Venous and Pulmonary-Artery CathetersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in U.S. Hospitals, 1975–1991Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1992
- The Crisis in Antibiotic ResistanceScience, 1992
- Quantitative tip culture methods and the diagnosis of central venous catheter-related infectionsDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1992
- Optimal Duration of Therapy for Catheter-Related Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Study of 55 Cases and ReviewClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Nosocomial infection rates in adult and pediatric intensive care units in the United StatesThe American Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Economic Benefits of an Effective Infection Control Program: Case Study and ProposalClinical Infectious Diseases, 1989
- Hub Colonization as the Initial Step in an Outbreak of Catheter‐Related Sepsis Due to Coagulase Negative Staphylococci during Parenteral NutritionJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1984
- A Semiquantitative Culture Method for Identifying Intravenous-Catheter-Related InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977