Irrational Attributions of Responsibility: Who, What, When, and Why
- 1 April 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 52 (2), 403-406
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.52.2.403
Abstract
“Irrational” attributions of responsibility (attributing more responsibility to a victim when his misfortune is greater and attributing more responsibility to a weaker rather than a stronger victim) were more common when decisions were hurried and among people who characteristically assign causes of actions to persons. People whose moral judgments are more sophisticated in Kohlberg's schema made fewer irrational attributions generally.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘Irrational’ attributions of responsibility: Who's to blame for them?European Journal of Social Psychology, 1981
- Individual differences in the effects of engaging in counter‐attitudinal behavior1Journal of Personality, 1975
- An Analysis of the Concept of Moral IntentionalityHuman Development, 1973
- FROM IS TO OUGHT: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away with It in the Study of Moral DevelopmentPublished by Elsevier ,1971
- Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970
- Assignment of responsibility for an accident.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966
- An empirical test of Heider's levels in attribution of responsibility.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964