Comparative Studies of Methods of Evaluating Antibacterial Substances: Part I. Evaluation of Bacteriostatic Action
- 1 September 1954
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
- Vol. 6 (1), 629-637
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1954.tb10997.x
Abstract
Summary Three methods of measuring bacteriostasis have been examined; dilution of the bacteriostatic agent with a liquid culture medium, incorporation of the agent in a solid medium, and a counting method. A fair degree of correlation has been shown to exist between the first two methods. The counting method has given support to Price's6 hypothesis that there is no real difference between bacteriostatic and bactericidal actions.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- AN IMPROVED PIPETTE FOR MEASURING SMALL VOLUMES OF BACTERIAL SUSPENSIONSJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1953
- BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL CONFERENCE HARROGATE, 1951Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1951
- THE MEANING OF BACTERIOSTASIS, BACTERICIDAL EFFECT, AND RATE OF DISINFECTIONAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1950
- PRESENT TRENDS IN METHODS OF TESTING ANTISEPTICSAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1950
- The diffusion of antiseptics through agar gels, with special reference to the agar cup assay method of estimating the activity of penicillinThe Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1946
- BacteriostasisThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1937