Mode of coaction between blue/UV light and light absorbed by phytochrome in light-mediated anthocyanin formation in the milo ( Sorghum vulgare Pers.) seedling
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 82 (18), 6124-6128
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.18.6124
Abstract
Anthocyanin formation in milo (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) seedlings (coleoptile, mesocotyl, taproot) occurs only in white light and blue/UV light (BL/UV), while red light (RL) and far-RL are totally ineffective. However, after a BL/UV pretreatment, the participation of phytochrome can be demonstrated. With a short-wavelength light source [peak emission in longwave UV (UV-A)], the mode of coaction between BL/UV and light absorbed by phytochrome (RL) was studied with the following principal results. (i) As soon as the seedling becomes competent to respond to UV-A (with regard to anthocyanin formation), the involvement of phytochrome can be detected. (ii) A 5-min pulse of UV-A has a strong effect on the anthocyanin synthesis in the milo mesocotyl. This effect is fully reversible if a long-wavelength far-RL pulse (RG9 light) is given immediately after the UV-A light pulse. (iii) When seedlings treated with 5 min of UV-A and 5 min of RG9 light are kept in darkness for 3 hr and then transferred to RL, anthocyanin appears. (iv) In continuous UV-A treatment, anthocyanin accumulation starts after a lag phase of 3.5 hr (25.degree. C). A RL pretreatment prior to the onset of UV-A treatment strongly increases anthocyanin accumulation in UV-A, though the lag phase is not affected. Moreover, a RL pretreatment does not affect the time course for escape from reversibility in UVA-A. It is concluded from these data that BL/UV cannot mediate induction of anthocyanin synthesis in the absence of Pfr, the active form of phytochrome that absorbs maximally in the far-red. Rather, the action of BL/UV must be considered to establish responsiveness of the anthocyanin-producing mechanism to Pfr. Pfr operates in this system via two different channels. As the effector of the terminal response, it sets in motion the signal-response chain that eventually leads to the appearance of anthocyanin. This is a slow process with a lag phase of the order of 3.5 hr. The second function of Pfr is to determine the responsiveness to the effector Pfr in mediating anthocyanin synthesis. This is a very fast and highly sensitive phytochrome action that can be detected readily within 1 min. However, as long as the plant has not received BL/UV, the strong effect of RL on the effectiveness of Pfr remains cryptic. The effect of a RL pretreatment and the effect of a UV-A pretreatment on responsiveness towards Pfr (or, effectiveness of Pfr) were found to be totally independent of each other, even though it is the UV-A, that permits operation of Pfr.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- MODE OF COACTION OF PHYTOCHROME AND BLUE LIGHT PHOTORECEPTOR IN CONTROL OF HYPOCOTYL ELONGATIONPhotochemistry and Photobiology, 1984
- Induction versus modulation in phytochrome-regulated biochemical processesPlanta, 1984
- Responsivity amplification by light in phytochrome‐mediated induction of chloroplast glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (NADP‐dependent, EC 1.2.1.13) in the shoot of milo (Sorghum vulgare Pers.)Plant, Cell & Environment, 1984
- Evidence that a mustard seedling responds to the amount of Pfr and not to the Pfr/PtotratioPlant, Cell & Environment, 1982
- A NOVEL EFFECT OF UV‐B IN A HIGHER PLANT (SORGHUM VULGARE)Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1981
- An Analysis of Phytochrome-mediated Anthocyanin SynthesisPlant Physiology, 1971
- Flavonoids and related phenolic compounds produced in the first internode of Sorghum vulgare Pers. in darkness and in light.Plant Physiology, 1965
- Photocontrol of Anthocyanin Synthesis in Milo SeedlingsPlant Physiology, 1963