BMI and waist circumference as predictors of lifetime colon cancer risk in Framingham Study adults
Open Access
- 10 February 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Obesity
- Vol. 28 (4), 559-567
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802606
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the increased risk of colon cancer associated with obesity differs for men and women, by distribution of body fat, or by location of the tumor. The primary goal of this study was to address these questions. METHODS: Eligible subjects from the Framingham Study cohort were classified according to body mass index (BMI) and waist size during two age periods: 30–54 y (n=3764) and 55–79 y (n=3802). All eligible men and women were cancer-free at baseline and had complete information on the following potential confounders: age, sex, education, height, activity, smoking, and alcohol. There were 157 incident lifetime cases of colon cancer among those followed beginning at 30–54 y of age and 149 lifetime cases among those whose follow up began at 55–79 y. Subjects were stratified further by gender, activity, and tumor location. The Cox Proportional Hazards Models were used to adjust for possible confounding by the above-described factors. RESULTS: A BMI ≥30 led to a 50% increased risk (95% CI: 0.92–2.5) of colon cancer among middle-aged (30–54 y) and a 2.4-fold increased risk (95% CI: 1.5–3.9) among older (55–79 y) adults. The BMI effect was stronger for men than for women and for cases occurring in the proximal colon. These adverse effects generally diminished when waist was added to the multivariable models. A larger waist size (≥99.1 cm (39 in) and 101.6 cm (40 in) for women and men, respectively) was associated with a two-fold increased risk of colon cancer; this risk increased linearly with increasing waist size and was evident for both proximal and distal colon cancer. There was no attenuation of these effects when BMI was added to the multivariable models. A larger waist had a particularly adverse effect among sedentary subjects (relative risk (RR)=4.4 for middle-aged adults; RR=3.0 for older adults). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that waist circumference is a stronger predictor of colon cancer risk than is BMI, and that central obesity is responsible for an increased risk of cancer of both the proximal and distal colon.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanisms Linking Diet and Colorectal Cancer: The Possible Role of Insulin ResistanceNutrition and Cancer, 2000
- Body size and the risk of colon cancer in a large case-control studyInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998
- Nutrition and Human CancerAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1997
- A prospective study of weight, body mass index and other anthropometric measurements in relation to site‐specific cancersInternational Journal of Cancer, 1994
- Obesity and cancer risk: a danish record-linkage studyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1994
- Quetelet's Index and Risk of Colon Cancer in College AlumniJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1992
- The cancer experience in the framingham heart study cohortCancer, 1991
- Diet, body mass and colorectal cancer: A case‐referent study in StockholmInternational Journal of Cancer, 1990
- Body weight and physical activity as predictors of colorectal cancer riskNutrition and Cancer, 1990
- Hazard of Obesity‐the Norwegian ExperienceActa Medica Scandinavica, 1987