Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
- 6 June 1992
- Vol. 304 (6840), 1491-1494
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENTJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTICAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1983
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Disagreement Between Observers in an Epidemiological Study of Respiratory DiseaseBMJ, 1955
- Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale CodingPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1955
- OBSERVER ERROR IN THE INTERPRETATION OF CHEST FILMS: AN INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONThe Lancet, 1952