Economic evaluation alongside pragmatic randomised trials: developing a standard operating procedure for clinical trials units
Open Access
- 17 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 9 (1), 64
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-64
Abstract
There is wide recognition that pragmatic randomised trials are the best vehicle for economic evaluation. This is because trials provide the best chance of ensuring internal validity, not least through the rigorous prospective collection of patient-specific data. Furthermore the marginal cost of collecting economic data alongside clinical data is typically modest. UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) does not require a standard operating procedure (SOP) for economic evaluation as a prerequisite for trial unit registration. We judge that such a SOP facilitates the integration of health economics into trials.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic EvaluationPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2016
- Folate Augmentation of Treatment – Evaluation for Depression (FolATED): protocol of a randomised controlled trialBMC Psychiatry, 2007
- Parenting programme for parents of children at risk of developing conduct disorder: cost effectiveness analysisBMJ, 2007
- Good Research Practices for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force ReportValue in Health, 2005
- Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care ProgrammesPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2005
- Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: Recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2005
- Cost-utility analysis of osteopathy in primary care: results from a pragmatic randomized controlled trialFamily Practice, 2004