Abstract
The in vitro and various modifications of the in vivo assay for nitrate reductase have been compared in order to elucidate their usefulness in studies of diurnal variations of enzyme activity in barley leaves (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Herta). Generally, activity was low in the morning and increased rapidly during the first hours of the photoperiod. In the in vivo assay the leaf tissue was vacuum‐infiltrated, whereafter either N2 was bubbled through the assay buffer (anaerobic assay), or no N2 was used (aerobic assay). Activity was 2–25 times higher in the anaerobic than in the aerobic assay. Anaerobiosis enhanced activity most during the dark period when the nitrate reductase level was low. Aerobic in vivo activity usually showed a more rapid decrease towards the end of the light period than did anaerobic activity. Addition of glucose and/or nitrate to the in vivo assay buffer usually stimulated activity more in the aerobic than in the anaerobic assay. In the morning, at the end of the dark period, these additives stimulated activity by 20–400% depending on growth and assay conditions. Later in the day stimulation was usually less, and even a slight inhibition was observed when only nitrate (0.1 M) was added. The effect of these additives on the activity patterns determined was to dampen the oscillations. The additives were therefore not advantageous when testing diurnal variations. However, when the plants were grown under relatively poor light conditions it was necessary to add nitrate and glucose to the aerobic in vivo assay buffer since activity was otherwise too low to be measured. The in vitro assay gave about 5 times higher activity than the anaerobic in vivo assay. During the last part of the dark period in vivo activity (without glucose and KNO3 in the assay buffer) decreased while in vitro activity remained constant.