Robustness of the two independent samples t‐test when applied to ordinal scaled data
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 6 (1), 79-90
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060110
Abstract
One may encounter the application of the two independent samples t-test to ordinal scaled data (for example, data that assume only the values 0, 1, 2, 3) from small samples. This situation clearly violates the underlying normality assumption for the t-test and one cannot appeal to large sample theory for validity. In this paper we report the results of an investigation of the t-test's robustness when applied to data of this form for samples of sizes 5 to 20. Our approach consists of complete enumeration of the sampling distributions and comparison of actual levels of significance with the significance level expected if the data followed a normal distribution. We demonstrate under general conditions the robustness of the t-test in that the maximum actual level of significance is close to the declared level.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Male Gonadal Dysfunction in Hodgkin's DiseaseJAMA, 1981
- The Effects of One‐Day Treatment of Anxiety with High Doses of HalazepamThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1978
- Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and CovarianceReview of Educational Research, 1972
- Analysis of Contingency Tables Having Ordered Response CategoriesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1972
- The Wilcoxon, Ties, and the ComputerJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1966
- The effects of violations of assumptions underlying the t test.Psychological Bulletin, 1960