Deducing the pattern of arthropod phytogeny from mitochondrial DNA rearrangements
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 376 (6536), 163-165
- https://doi.org/10.1038/376163a0
Abstract
The origins of arthropods and the phylogenetic relationships among their three major living groups (atelocerates, crustaceans and chelicerates) are vigorously contended. To help resolve this, we determined mitochondrial gene arrangements for a chelicerate, a myriapod, two crustaceans, an onychophoran, a mollusc and an annelid, and compared them with published gene orders of other species. The result strongly supports the monophyly of Arthropoda and of Mandibulata (atelocerates plus crustaceans) and refutes the Uniramia (atelocerates plus onychophorans). Gene arrangement comparisons are emerging as a powerful new tool for resolving ancient phylogenetic relationships.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The mitochondrial genome of Anopheles quadrimaculatus species A: complete nucleotide sequence and gene organizationGenome, 1993
- Congruence Between Molecular and Morphological PhylogeniesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1993
- ARTHROPOD PHYLOGENY: A COMBINED APPROACHCladistics, 1993
- Evidence from 12 S Ribosomal RNA Sequences that Onychophorans Are Modified ArthropodsScience, 1992
- Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene among 10 orders of insectsMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1992
- The "Uniramia" do not exist: the ground plan of the Pterygota as revealed by Permian Diaphanopterodea from Russia (Insecta: Paleodictyopteroidea)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1992
- Animal Mitochondrial DNA: Structure and EvolutionInternational Review of Cytology, 1992
- Molecular Phylogeny of the Animal KingdomScience, 1988
- Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively MisleadingSystematic Zoology, 1978
- Trilobites and the Origin of ArthropodsScience, 1974