Editorial Commentary:Laboratory Testing for Lyme Disease: Time for a Change?
Open Access
- 15 July 2008
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 47 (2), 196-197
- https://doi.org/10.1086/589316
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective Study of Serologic Tests for Lyme DiseaseClinical Infectious Diseases, 2008
- The Clinical Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention of Lyme Disease, Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, and Babesiosis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of AmericaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Appropriateness of Lyme Disease Serologic TestingAnnals of Family Medicine, 2004
- Asymptomatic Infection with Borrelia burgdorferiClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Persistence of Immunoglobulin M or Immunoglobulin G Antibody Responses toBorrelia burgdorferi10–20 Years after Active Lyme DiseaseClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Lyme DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Guidelines for Laboratory Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Lyme DiseaseAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Serodiagnosis of Lyme Disease: Accuracy of a Two-Step Approach Using a Flagella-Based ELISA and ImmunoblottingThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1996
- False-positive Lyme disease serology in human granulocytic ehrlichiosisThe Lancet, 1996
- Western Blotting in the Serodiagnosis of Lyme DiseaseThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1993