Optimal survey design for community intervention evaluations: Cohort or cross-sectional?
- 31 December 1995
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 48 (12), 1461-1472
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00055-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cohort versus cross‐sectional design in large field trials: Precision, sample size, and a unifying modelStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Selected Methodological Issues in Evaluating Community-Based Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ProgramsAnnual Review of Public Health, 1992
- Assessing response bias in random-digit dialling surveys: The telephone-prefix methodStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- The evaluation of the Henry J. Kaiser family foundation's community health promotion grant program: DesignJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. The Stanford Five-City ProjectJAMA, 1990
- Food-Based Validation of a Dietary Questionnaire: The Effects of Week-to-Week Variation in Food ConsumptionInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1989
- A framework for evaluating community-based heart disease prevention programsSocial Science & Medicine, 1986
- Analysis of Community-Based Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Studies—Evaluation Issues in the North Karelia Project and the Minnesota Heart Health ProgramInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1986
- Community-wide prevention strategies: Evaluation design of the Minnesota Heart Health ProgramJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- THE STANFORD FIVE-CITY PROJECT: DESIGN AND METHODSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985