Myopotential Inhibition of Unipolar QRS‐inhibited (VVI) Pacemakers, Assessed by Ambulatory Holter Monitoring of the Electrocardiogram
- 1 July 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 3 (4), 470-478
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1980.tb05257.x
Abstract
Seventy-four patients with unipolar QRS-inhibited pacemakers (VVI) were Holter monitored to assess the occurrence of pacemaker inhibition caused by skeletal muscle potentials during daily activities. Fifty patients had high-grade atrioventricular block and 24 had sinoatrial disease. Chest wall stimulation prior to monitoring revealed asystole of > 4 seconds duration in 22 patients, and ventricular rates between 25 and 56 beats per minute in 52 patients. Fifty-one patients (69%) had one or more episodes of pacemaker inhibition from myopotentials. Inhibition occurred in all types of pacemakers studies, but was most frequent and of longest duration in patients with Siemens-Elema 207/70 (13/14 patients), Cordis Omni-Stanicor (6/7 patients), CPI Microlith (5/6 patients), and Medtronic 5945 (8/10 patients). This was not unexpected considering the filter characteristics of the pacemakers. Nine patients (12%) presented symptoms which might be ascribed to pacemaker inhibition. The longest asystole observed was 3.2 s. Seven patients had pacemakers spikes falling on or near T-waves of spontaneous heart beats because their pacemakers had been rendered refractory by myopotentials. No serious arrhythmias were seen during episodes of pacemaker inhibition or interference. More emphasis should be put on the improvement of filter characteristics of unipolar VVI-pacemakers. Pacemaker patients with symptoms of myopotential inhibition should be equipped with either a bipolar or ventricular triggered (VVT) pacemaker or with a sensitivity and/or pacing mode programmable pacemaker.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Demand Failures Occurring during Permanent Pacing in Patients with Serious Heart DiseasePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1980
- The Interdependence Between Electrogram, Total Electrode Impedance and Pacemaker Input Impedance Necessary to Obtain Adequate Functioning of Demand PacemakersPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1979
- Suppression of an External Demand Pacemaker by Diaphragmatic Myopotentials: A Sign of Electrode Perforation?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1979
- Patients with High‐Grade Atrioventricular Block Treated and not Treated with a PacemakerActa Medica Scandinavica, 1978
- Myopotential inhibition of a bipolar pacemaker caused by electrode insulation defect.Heart, 1977
- Inhibition of bipolar demand pacemaker by diaphragmatic myopotentials.Circulation, 1977
- Inhibition of a ventricular synchronous pacemakerAmerican Heart Journal, 1977
- Ventricular fibrillation induced by a unipolar implanted pacemaker (cathodal stimulation)American Heart Journal, 1976
- Interference effect of myopotenitals on function of unipolar demand pacemakers.Heart, 1974
- THE RISK OF PACING AFTER INFARCTION, AND CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONSThe Lancet, 1969