A study of the value of the seven-point checklist in distinguishing benign pigmented lesions from melanoma
- 1 May 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
- Vol. 15 (3), 167-171
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.1990.tb02064.x
Abstract
A seven-point scoring system has been adopted by the Cancer Research Campaign to help non-dermatologists recognize melanoma (MM). Its value is reviewed in the light of increasing referrals of pigmented lesions. One-hundred and ninety-five patients (M:F, 43:152; mean age = 43 years, s.d. = 19) were asked whether their lesions possessed the seven points before diagnosis. The dermatologist assess the signs. Six patients were unable to comply and some had multiple lesions; thus, 216 lesions were fully assessed by patient and dermatologist, and six by the dermatologist alone. Histology was obtained where appropriate. There were eight MMs, 95 naevi, 80 seborrhoeic warts, three naevi, and 36 other lesions. Seven of the eight MMs were diagnosed clinically; the other was biopsied because of suspicious features and was a nodular MM. Four lesions suspected to be MMs proved benign. The predictive value (PV) of a clinical diagnosis of MM was 64% and non-MM was 99%. Using accepted cutpoints for the seven-point system (refer if score .gtoreq. 3) patients'' scores gave a PV for MM of 7% and for non-MM scored less than three. Dermatologist''s scores gave a PV for MM of 8% and for non-MM of 99%. One MM scored < 3. Univariate analyses showed that enlargement (P < 0.05), determtologists'' assessments of a irregular margin (P < 0.001), size (P < 0.05) and pigmentary irregularity (P < 0.05), and patients'' assessments of size (P< 0.05) were statistically significant. Five patients with MM did not recongize the irregular margin. After stepwise logistic regression analysis of the dermatologists'' assessments, only irregulary of the margin remained significant. This single sing gave a PV for MM of 13% and fro non-MM of 100%. No MMs were missed. Fifty-five (26%) of 214 non-MM lesions had an irregular margin. No useful discrimination was obtained from the patients'' assessments. We conclude that if these results are confirmed then considerable emphasis should be placed on educating the public to recognize the single feature of irregularity of the margin in order to improve the early detection of melanoma.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy in clinically evaluating pigmented lesions.BMJ, 1989
- No guidelines for patients examining pigmented lesionsBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1989
- Experience of a public education programme on early detection of cutaneous malignant melanoma.BMJ, 1988
- Reasons for poor prognosis in British patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma.BMJ, 1986
- A Multifactorial Analysis of MelanomaAnnals of Surgery, 1978
- Thickness, Cross-Sectional Areas and Depth of Invasion in the Prognosis of Cutaneous MelanomaAnnals of Surgery, 1970