Responsiveness of five condition-specific and generic outcome assessment instruments for chronic pain
Open Access
- 25 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 8 (1), 26
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-26
Abstract
Changes of health and quality-of-life in chronic conditions are mostly small and require specific and sensitive instruments. The aim of this study was to determine and compare responsiveness, i.e. the sensitivity to change of five outcome instruments for effect measurement in chronic pain.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Back Pain: A Prospective Outcome StudyThe Journal of Pain, 2006
- Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the German Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ-D)The Journal of Pain, 2006
- Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluationControlled Clinical Trials, 1991
- Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic EvaluationMedical Care, 1990
- The american college of rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgiaArthritis & Rheumatism, 1990
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients: Integration of psychological assessment data.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI)Pain, 1985
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983