When Should Uncertain Nonpoint Emissions Be Penalized in a Trading Program?
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Vol. 90 (1), 249-255
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01043.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pollution Trading in Water Quality Limited Areas: Use of Benefits Assessment and Cost-Effective Trading RatiosLand Economics, 2005
- When Two Wrongs Make a Right: Second‐Best Point‐Nonpoint Trading RatiosAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2005
- Tests for the Role of Risk Aversion on Input UseAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003
- Point‐nonpoint nutrient trading in the Susquehanna River basinWater Resources Research, 2002
- Testing Lorenz Curves with Non-Simple Random SamplesEconometrica, 2002
- Differences in Social and Public Risk Perceptions and Conflicting Impacts on Point/Nonpoint Trading RatiosAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001
- Statistical Inference for Stochastic Dominance and for the Measurement of Poverty and InequalityEconometrica, 2000
- Point/Nonpoint Source Trading of Pollution Abatement: Choosing the Right Trading RatioAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1993
- The allocative efficiency implications of water pollution abatement cost comparisonsWater Resources Research, 1990
- Testing for Stochastic DominanceAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1988