Ultrasonographic dating of pregnancy causes significant errors in Down syndrome risk assessment that may be minimized by use of biparietal diameter—based means
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 166 (3), 872-877
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91353-c
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Mathematical Basis of Multivariate Risk Screening: With Special Reference to Screening for Down's Syndrome Associated PregnancyAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 1990
- Clinical Articles Maternal serum α-fetoprotein screening for fetal Down syndrome in the United States: Results of a surveyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990
- Prenatal screening for Down syndrome with maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levelsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Combining maternal serum α-fetoprotein measurements and age to screen for Down syndrome in pregnant women under age 35American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy.BMJ, 1988
- Low second trimester maternal serum unconjugated oestriol in pregnancies with Down's syndromeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988
- Estimating a woman's risk of having a pregnancy associated with Down's syndrome using her age and serum alpha‐fetoprotein levelBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987
- An association between low maternal serum α-fetoprotein and fetal chromosomal abnormalitiesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984
- MATERNAL SERUM ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN MEASUREMENT: A SCREENING TEST FOR DOWN SYNDROMEThe Lancet, 1984
- Analysis of biparietal diameter as an accurate indicator of gestational ageJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1980