Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry
Top Cited Papers
- 9 June 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 61 (10), 991-996
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between‐study heterogeneityStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- The case of the misleading funnel plotBMJ, 2006
- Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysisJAMA, 2006
- A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpointsStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameterStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Methods for Meta‐analysis in Medical Research. Alex J. Sutton, Keith R. Abrams, David R. Jones, Trevor A. Sheldon and Fujian Song, Wiley, Chichester, U.K., 2000. No. of pages: xvii+317. ISBN 0‐471‐49066‐0Statistics in Medicine, 2003
- Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneityStatistics in Medicine, 2003
- Estimating Effect Size Under Publication Bias: Small Sample Properties and Robustness of a Random Effects Selection ModelJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995