Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 355 (9198), 103-106
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02171-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Guidelines Following Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- Open letter disputes WHO hypertension guidelinesBMJ, 1999
- Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelinesInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1999
- Guidelines in general practice: the new Tower of Babel?BMJ, 1998
- Conflict of Interest in the Debate over Calcium-Channel AntagonistsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996
- Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviewsThe Lancet, 1996
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- Appraising clinical guidelines: towards a "which" guide for purchasers.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1994
- Practice Policies—Guidelines for MethodsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990