Is energy imparted a good measure of the radiation risk associated with CT examinations?
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- scientific note
- Published by IOP Publishing in Physics in Medicine & Biology
- Vol. 29 (9), 1137-1142
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/29/9/010
Abstract
The dose distribution in a Rando phantom has been measured for typical EMI 5005 CT scans of the head, chest, abdomen and pelvis. These dose distributions have been used to generate quantitative estimates of the somatic and genetic radiation risks associated with these CT examinations and also to measure the total energy imparted during each scan. A comparison has been made between the radiation risk estimates and the energy impart measurements. The energy imparted measurements are not a good indicator of the somatic and/or genetic risks when one type of CT scan is compared with another. However, for a given type of scan, the energy imparted may be a reasonable indicator of the relative somatic risks associated with different CT examinations. Considerable care should be taken when interpreting and using any measured value of energy imparted in a radiological examination since published values of the risk per unit energy imparted significantly underestimate the radiation risk.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- An evaluation of the Diamentor transmission ionisation chamber in indicating exposure-area product (R cm2) during diagnostic radiological examinationsPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1982
- Radiation dosimetry survey of computed tomography systems from ten manufacturersThe British Journal of Radiology, 1982
- CT scanner comparisonMedical Physics, 1981
- The radiation dose to patients from EMI brain and body scannersThe British Journal of Radiology, 1979
- Energy Imparted in Roentgen Diagnostic ProceduresActa Radiologica. Diagnosis, 1979