A randomised trial, conducted by midwives, of perineal repairs comparing a polyglycolic suture material and chromic catgut
- 1 September 2002
- Vol. 18 (3), 223-229
- https://doi.org/10.1054/midw.2002.0313
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treatmentBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995
- Changes in women's physical health during the first postpartum yearArchives of Family Medicine, 1993
- Episiotomy repair—suture material and short term morbidityJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- The Southmead perineal suture study. A randomized comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques for repair of perineal traumaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Comparability of Randomised GroupsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1985
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Polyglycolic acid and catgut sutures, with and without oral proteolytic enzymes, in the healing of episiotomiesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983
- Statistical Aspects of Clinical Trial DesignJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1982
- A COMPARISON BETWEEN CATGUT AND POLYGLYCOLIC ACID SUTURES IN EPISIOTOMY REPAIRBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1974
- The absorption of surgical catgutBritish Journal of Surgery, 1959