Flutamide Versus Prednisone in Patients With Prostate Cancer Symptomatically Progressing After Androgen-Ablative Therapy: A Phase III Study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 19 (1), 62-71
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.1.62
Abstract
PURPOSE: Time to progression (TTP), overall survival, and quality of life (QL) were compared in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) treated with prednisone (5 mg orally, four times a day) or flutamide (250 mg orally, three times a day). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Symptomatic patients were randomized to receive either prednisone (101 patients) or flutamide (100 patients). Subjective response was assessed based on performance status, the use of analgesics, and the need to apply alternative palliative treatment. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based biochemical response (≥ 50% reduction of baseline PSA) was recorded. At baseline and at 6-week intervals during follow-up, patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30. RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups in median TTP (prednisone, 3.4 months; flutamide, 2.3 months) or overall survival (prednisone, 10.6 months; flutamide, 11.2 months). In the prednisone group, 56% of the patients experienced a subjective response, compared with 45% in the flutamide group (P = .18). The median response duration was 4.8 months for prednisone and 4.2 months for flutamide. A biochemical response was observed in 21% and 23% of the prednisone and flutamide groups, respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity was the reason for trial discontinuation in seven patients receiving flutamide and two patients receiving prednisone. The QL assessment parameters favored the use of prednisone with statistically significant differences in pain, fatigue, role functioning, appetite loss, gastrointestinal distress, and overall QL. CONCLUSION: In symptomatic HRPC, treatment with prednisone or flutamide leads to similar rates of TTP and overall survival and no difference in subjective or biochemical response. The QL results favor the use of low-cost prednisone in patients with HRPC.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Eligibility and Response Guidelines for Phase II Clinical Trials in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer: Recommendations From the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapyUrology, 1996
- Goserelin acetate and flutamide versus bilateral orchiectomy: a phase III eortc trial (30853)Urology, 1993
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Nonsteroidal Antiandrogen Monotherapy of Metastatic Cancer of the ProstateEuropean Urology, 1993
- Some Limitations of the Radioisotope Bone Scan in Patients With Metastatic Prostatic CancerCancer, 1990
- A Controlled Trial of Leuprolide with and without Flutamide in Prostatic CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Benefits of Combination Therapy with Flutamide in Patients Relapsing after CastrationBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- Androgen Suppression by Hydrocortisone without Aminoglutethimide in Orchiectomised Men with Prostatic CancerBritish Journal of Urology, 1987
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981