Women, men, and rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of disease activity, disease characteristics, and treatments in the QUEST-RA Study
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 14 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Arthritis Research & Therapy
- Vol. 11 (1), R6-R7
- https://doi.org/10.1186/ar2591
Abstract
Introduction: Gender as a predictor of outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evoked considerable interest over the decades. Historically, there is no consensus whether RA is worse in females or males. Recent reports suggest that females are less likely than males to achieve remission. Therefore, we aimed to study possible associations of gender and disease activity, disease characteristics, and treatments of RA in a large multinational cross-sectional cohort of patients with RA called Quantitative Standard Monitoring of Patients with RA (QUEST-RA). Methods: The cohort includes clinical and questionnaire data from patients who were seen in usual care, including 6,004 patients at 70 sites in 25 countries as of April 2008. Gender differences were analyzed for American College of Rheumatology Core Data Set measures of disease activity, DAS28 (disease activity score using 28 joint counts), fatigue, the presence of rheumatoid factor, nodules and erosions, and the current use of prednisone, methotrexate, and biologic agents. Results: Women had poorer scores than men in all Core Data Set measures. The mean values for females and males were swollen joint count-28 (SJC28) of 4.5 versus 3.8, tender joint count-28 of 6.9 versus 5.4, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 30 versus 26, Health Assessment Questionnaire of 1.1 versus 0.8, visual analog scales for physician global estimate of 3.0 versus 2.5, pain of 4.3 versus 3.6, patient global status of 4.2 versus 3.7, DAS28 of 4.3 versus 3.8, and fatigue of 4.6 versus 3.7 (P < 0.001). However, effect sizes were small-medium and smallest (0.13) for SJC28. Among patients who had no or minimal disease activity (0 to 1) on SJC28, women had statistically significantly higher mean values compared with men in all other disease activity measures (P < 0.001) and met DAS28 remission less often than men. Rheumatoid factor was equally prevalent among genders. Men had nodules more often than women. Women had erosions more often than men, but the statistical significance was marginal. Similar proportions of females and males were taking different therapies. Conclusions: In this large multinational cohort, RA disease activity measures appear to be worse in women than in men. However, most of the gender differences in RA disease activity may originate from the measures of disease activity rather than from RA disease activity itself.Keywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monetary value of lost productivity over a five year follow up in early rheumatoid arthritis estimated on the basis of official register data on patients' sickness absence and gross income: experience from the FIN-RACo trialAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2005
- Patients seen for standard rheumatoid arthritis care have significantly better articular, radiographic, laboratory, and functional status in 2000 than in 1985Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2005
- Reduction in long-term functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis from 1977 to 1998:a longitudinal study of 3035 patientsAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 2003
- Somatic symptom reporting in women and men.Published by Co-Action Publishing ,2001
- Lower disease activity and disability in Swedish patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 1995 compared with 1978.1999
- Does sex of rheumatoid arthritis patients matter?The Lancet, 1998
- DISABILITY IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - COMPARISON OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS ACROSS 3 POPULATIONS1987
- Severe functional declines, work disability, and increased mortality in seventy‐five rheumatoid arthritis patients studied over nine yearsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1984
- Progression of radiological changes in rheumatoid arthritis.Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 1984
- Work Disability in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Effects of Disease, Social, and Work FactorsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1980