The Penile Versus the Perineal Approach With the Small-Carrion Prosthesis
- 1 October 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 126 (4), 473-474
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54583-8
Abstract
The experience with insertion of the Small-Carrion prosthesis is reviewed; the penile and the perineal approaches are compared. The penile approach is more satisfactory since it resulted in fewer complications and a shorter operative time.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Silicone-Silver Penile Prosthesis: Description, Operative Approach and ResultsJournal of Urology, 1980
- Penoscrotal Approach for Placement of Paired Penile Implants for ImpotenceJournal of Urology, 1979
- Experience with Implantation of the Small-Carrion Penile Implant for Organic ImpotenceJournal of Urology, 1976
- Small-Carrion penile prosthesisUrology, 1975
- A history of surgical treatment of impotenceUrology, 1975