Males Have Larger Skeletal Size and Bone Mass Than Females, Despite Comparable Body Size
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 20 (3), 529-535
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.041005
Abstract
Gender differences in fractures may be related to body size, bone size, geometry, or density. We studied this in 18-year-old males (n = 36) and females (n = 36) matched for height and weight. Despite comparable body size, males have greater BMC and BMD at the hip and distal tibia and greater tibial cortical thickness. This may confer greater skeletal integrity in males. Introduction: Gender differences in fractures may be related to body size, bone size, geometry, or density. We studied this in males (n = 36) and females (n = 36; mean age = 18 years) pair-matched for height and weight. Materials and Methods: BMC, bone area (BA), and BMD were measured in the spine and hip using DXA. Distal tibia was measured by pQCT. Results and Conclusions: Males had a higher lean mass (92%) compared with females (79%). No gender differences were observed for vertebral BMC or vertebral height, although males had greater width and thus BA at the spine. Males had greater BMC and BA at the femoral neck and total femur (p < 0.02). Geometric variables of the hip including neck diameter and neck-axis length were also greater in males (p < 0.02). There was greater cross-sectional moment of inertia, safety factor, and fall index in males (all p < 0.02). Males had greater tibial BMC, volumetric BMD, and cortical area and thickness compared with females (p < 0.01), with both greater periosteal circumference (p = 0.011) and smaller endosteal circumference (p = 0.058). Statistically controlling for lean mass reduced gender differences, but males still had 8% higher hip BMD (p = 0.24) and 5.3% higher total tibial BMD (p = 0.05). A subset of males and females were matched (n = 14 pairs) for total hip BA. Males in this subset still had greater BMC and BMD at the total hip (p < 0.05) than females, despite similar BA. In summary, despite comparable body size, males have greater BMC and BMD than females at the hip and distal tibia but not at the spine. Differences in BMC and BMD were related to greater cortical thickness in the tibia. We conclude that differences in bone mass and geometry confer greater skeletal integrity in males, which may contribute to the lower incidence of stress and osteoporotic fractures in males.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Exercise in GeometryJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2002
- Moderate Exercise During Growth in Prepubertal Boys: Changes in Bone Mass, Size, Volumetric Density, and Bone Strength: A Controlled Prospective StudyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- Bone Density Variation and Its Effects on Risk of Vertebral Deformity in Men and Women Studied in Thirteen European Centers: The EVOS StudyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Secular Trends in Hip Fracture Occurrence and SurvivalJournal of Aging and Health, 1996
- Hindlimb suspension diminishes femoral cross‐sectional growth in the ratJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1995
- Comparison of areal and estimated volumetric bone mineral density values between older men and womenOsteoporosis International, 1995
- Bone mineral density measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry in normal menEuropean Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1992
- Bone mass and body composition in normal womenJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1992
- Sex differences in peak adult bone mineral densityJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1990
- Effect of denervation on limb growthJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1989