An Analysis of Bilateral and Unilateral Reminiscence
- 1 February 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 26 (1), 95-98
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1968.26.1.95
Abstract
224 Ss practiced on the pursuit rotor with massed practice for 15 min. The four conditions of practice were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial with initial hand practice (5 min., left or right) occurring with or without a 5-min. rest at the end of the fifth minute of practice. All groups finished with 10 min. of right-handed practice. Trial means, standard deviations, and correlations were analyzed for differences between bilateral and unilateral reminiscence. The unilateral reminiscence group showed a significantly greater mean gain after rest than the bilateral reminiscence group. Rest did not have the effect of reinstating the original individual differences. For trials spanning rest, r dropped more for unilateral than for bilateral reminiscence groups. It was concluded that bilateral and unilateral reminiscence were best measured by changes in the mean time on target and not by changes in measures of variance.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practice as a process of simplification.Psychological Review, 1962
- Individual differences and theory in a motor learning task.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1955
- 'Reminiscence" in bilateral transfer.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952
- Effect of varying amounts of rest on conventional and bilateral transfer 'reminiscence."Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952
- Transfer of work inhibition in motor learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952