Deep‐learning‐based, computer‐aided classifier developed with a small dataset of clinical images surpasses board‐certified dermatologists in skin tumour diagnosis
Top Cited Papers
- 28 June 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Dermatology
- Vol. 180 (2), 373-381
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16924
Abstract
Background Application of deep‐learning technology to skin cancer classification can potentially improve the sensitivity and specificity of skin cancer screening, but the number of training images required for such a system is thought to be extremely large. Objectives To determine whether deep‐learning technology could be used to develop an efficient skin cancer classification system with a relatively small dataset of clinical images. Methods A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) was trained using a dataset of 4867 clinical images obtained from 1842 patients diagnosed with skin tumours at the University of Tsukuba Hospital from 2003 to 2016. The images consisted of 14 diagnoses, including both malignant and benign conditions. Its performance was tested against 13 board‐certified dermatologists and nine dermatology trainees. Results The overall classification accuracy of the trained DCNN was 76·5%. The DCNN achieved 96·3% sensitivity (correctly classified malignant as malignant) and 89·5% specificity (correctly classified benign as benign). Although the accuracy of malignant or benign classification by the board‐certified dermatologists was statistically higher than that of the dermatology trainees (85·3% ± 3·7% and 74·4% ± 6·8%, P < 0·01), the DCNN achieved even greater accuracy, as high as 92·4% ± 2·1% (P < 0·001). Conclusions We have developed an efficient skin tumour classifier using a DCNN trained on a relatively small dataset. The DCNN classified images of skin tumours more accurately than board‐certified dermatologists. Collectively, the current system may have capabilities for screening purposes in general medical practice, particularly because it requires only a single clinical image for classification.This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Incidence and Impact of Skin Cancer Screening on IncidenceJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 2014
- Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Skin Lesions Using Conventional Digital Photography: A Reliability and Feasibility StudyPLOS ONE, 2013
- On the Comparison of Diagnosis and Management of Melanoma Between Dermatologists and MelaFindJAMA Dermatology, 2013
- Melanoma recognition framework based on expert definition of ABCD for dermoscopic imagesSkin Research and Technology, 2012
- Worldwide Increasing Incidences of Cutaneous Malignant MelanomaJournal of Skin Cancer, 2011
- Pre-diagnostic digital imaging prediction model to discriminate between malignant melanoma and benign pigmented skin lesionSkin Research and Technology, 2010
- Skin Diseases in Family Medicine: Prevalence and Health Care UseAnnals of Family Medicine, 2008
- Multispectral imaging and artificial neural network: mimicking the management decision of the clinician facing pigmented skin lesionsPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2007
- Incidence of Basal Cell and Squamous Cell Carcinomas in a Population Younger Than 40 YearsJAMA, 2005
- Dermatology in general practiceBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1999