A Double-Blinded Evaluation of Propacetamol Versus Ketorolac in Combination with Patient-Controlled Analgesia Morphine
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 88 (3), 611-616
- https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199903000-00028
Abstract
We assessed the relative morphine consumption in a combined analgesic regimen (on-demand morphine plus the nonopioids propacetamol or ketorolac) after gynecologic surgery. Two hundred women randomly received two IV doses of propacetamol 2 g or ketorolac 30 mg in a double-blinded, double-dummy trial. Patients were monitored for 12 h, and the following efficacy variables were assessed; total dose of morphine, pain intensity, and global efficacy. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by the occurrence of adverse events, especially the presence and intensity of gastrointestinal symptoms. Hemostatic variables were measured 30 and 60 min after the first infusion; arterial blood pressure, heart and respiratory rates, sedation scores, and renal and hepatic function were also assessed. Total morphine requirements were not significantly different between the propacetamol (10.6 +/- 4.8 mg) and ketorolac (10.2 +/- 4.4 mg) groups. The evolution of pain intensity and the global efficacy also showed similar patterns in the two groups: 70.2% of patients in the propacetamol group rated the efficacy as "good/excellent" compared with 68.2% in the ketorolac group. There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs or laboratory values and no observed differences between the two groups, although ketorolac slightly, but not significantly, prolonged the bleeding time. Epigastric pain was present in 9% and 15% of patients receiving propacetamol and ketorolac, respectively. There were two adverse events in the propacetamol group and four in the ketorolac group. Propacetamol demonstrates an efficacy similar to that of ketorolac and has an excellent tolerability after gynecologic surgery. Implications: Propacetamol and ketorolac, combined with patient-controlled analgesia morphine, show similar analgesic efficacy after gynecologic surgery. Morphine consumption and pain scores were comparable in the two studied groups. Propacetamol is as effective as ketorolac and has an excellent tolerability after gynecologic surgery. (Anesth Analg 1999;88:611-16)Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of propacetamol in the treatment of postoperative pain Morphine‐sparing effect in orthopedic surgeryActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1998
- The morphine-sparing effect of propacetamol in orthopedic postoperative painJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1995
- Use of Ketorolac after Lower Abdominal Surgery Effect on Analgesic Requirement and Surgical OutcomeAnesthesiology, 1994
- The Value of ???Multimodal??? or ???Balanced Analgesia??? in Postoperative Pain TreatmentAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1993
- Tolerance and pharmacokinetics of propacetamol, a paracetamol formulation for intravenous useFundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 1992
- Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of paracetamol after a single intravenous dose of propacetamol.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1992
- Central analgesic effect of acetaminophen but not of aspirinClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1991
- Postoperative nefopam and diclofenac Evaluation of their morphine‐sparing effect after upper abdominal surgeryAnaesthesia, 1990
- Codeine 20 mg increases pain relief from ibuprofen 400 mg after third molar surgery. A repeat-dosing comparison of ibuprofen and an ibuprofen-codeine combinationPain, 1989
- The morphine sparing effect of ketorolac tromethamineAnaesthesia, 1987