Assessing Meaningful Change in Quality of Life Over Time: A Users' Guide for Clinicians
- 30 June 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
- Vol. 77 (6), 561-571
- https://doi.org/10.4065/77.6.561
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the Clinical Significance of Single Items Relative to Summated ScoresMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- Group vs Individual Approaches to Understanding the Clinical Significance of Differences or Changes in Quality of LifeMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- Methods for assessing responsivenessJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000
- Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United StatesQuality of Life Research, 2000
- Recommendations for Evaluating the Validity of Quality of Life Claims for Labeling and PromotionValue in Health, 1999
- Quality of Life in Advanced Prostate Cancer: Results of a Randomized Therapeutic TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
- Bilateral Orchiectomy with or without Flutamide for Metastatic Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteriaClinical Therapeutics, 1996
- Responsiveness to change: an aspect of validity, not a separate dimensionQuality of Life Research, 1992
- A Controlled Trial of Leuprolide with and without Flutamide in Prostatic CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989