Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium Resulted in Significantly Higher Tissue Chromium Burden Compared With Trivalent Chromium Following Similar Oral Doses to Male F344/N Rats and Female B6C3F1 Mice
Open Access
- 15 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Toxicological Sciences
- Vol. 118 (2), 368-379
- https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfq263
Abstract
In National Toxicology Program 2-year studies, hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] administered in drinking water was clearly carcinogenic in male and female rats and mice, resulting in small intestine epithelial neoplasms in mice at a dose equivalent to or within an order of magnitude of human doses that could result from consumption of chromium-contaminated drinking water, assuming that dose scales by body weight3/4 (body weight raised to the 3/4 power). In contrast, exposure to trivalent chromium [Cr(III)] at much higher concentrations may have been carcinogenic in male rats but was not carcinogenic in mice or female rats. As part of these studies, total chromium was measured in tissues and excreta of additional groups of male rats and female mice. These data were used to infer the uptake and distribution of Cr(VI) because Cr(VI) is reduced to Cr(III) in vivo, and no methods are available to speciate tissue chromium. Comparable external doses resulted in much higher tissue chromium concentrations following exposure to Cr(VI) compared with Cr(III), indicating that a portion of the Cr(VI) escaped gastric reduction and was distributed systemically. Linear or supralinear dose responses of total chromium in tissues were observed following exposure to Cr(VI), indicating that these exposures did not saturate gastric reduction capacity. When Cr(VI) exposure was normalized to ingested dose, chromium concentrations in the liver and glandular stomach were higher in mice, whereas kidney concentrations were higher in rats. In vitro studies demonstrated that Cr(VI), but not Cr(III), is a substrate of the sodium/sulfate cotransporter, providing a partial explanation for the greater absorption of Cr(VI).Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hexavalent Chromium Is Carcinogenic to F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice after Chronic Oral ExposureEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2009
- Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies of chromium picolinate monohydrate administered in feed to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice for 2 yearsFood and Chemical Toxicology, 2009
- Human Health Risk and Exposure Assessment of Chromium (VI) in Tap WaterJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 2003
- IS HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CARCINOGENIC VIA INGESTION? A WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE REVIEWJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 2002
- Toxicity and Carcinogenicity of Cr(VI) in Animal Models and HumansCritical Reviews in Toxicology, 1997
- INGESTION OF CHROMIUM(VI) IN DRINKING WATER BY HUMAN VOLUNTEERS: ABSORPTION, DISTRIBUTION, AND EXCRETION OF SINGLE AND REPEATED DOSESJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1997
- OBSERVATION OF STEADY STATE IN BLOOD AND URINE FOLLOWING HUMAN INGESTION OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM IN DRINKING WATERJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1996
- Absorption and elimination of trivalent and hexavalent chromium in humans following ingestion of a bolus dose in drinking waterToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1996
- Uptake of chromate in human red blood cells and isolated rat liver cells: the role of the anion carrierThe Analyst, 1995
- Multiple Comparisons Using Rank SumsTechnometrics, 1964