A strategic planning network for non‐profit organizations
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Strategic Management Journal
- Vol. 5 (1), 57-75
- https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050105
Abstract
Strategic planning processes are seldom treated from a contingency perspective. As a result, practitioners are unable to select a set of planning techniques for a particular situation they confront. This paper constructs methods, defined as sets of techniques, which are applicable to strategic planning for non‐profit organizations. These constructed planning methods are matched to strategic archetypes, defined by the sponsor's expectations for quality, acceptance, and/or innovation in the strategy. The contingency framework is presented as a network which identifies planning methods useful for each strategic archetype application.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- UTILITY MODELS FOR MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISIONS: DO THEY ACCURATELY REPRESENT HUMAN PREFERENCES?*Decision Sciences, 1979
- Patterns in Strategy FormationManagement Science, 1978
- Archetypes of Strategy FormulationManagement Science, 1978
- The benefits of planning with normative and heuristic approachesOmega, 1978
- An Experimental Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Planning MethodsManagement Science, 1977
- FIELD EXPERIMENTS WHICH COMPARED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DESIGN METHODS*Decision Sciences, 1976
- A comparative study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, Delphi groups, and nominal groupsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973
- A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program PlanningThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
- Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1970
- On the Art of ModelingManagement Science, 1967