A Comparison of Computer Input Devices: Linus Pen, Mouse, Cursor Keys and Keyboard
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting
- Vol. 33 (5), 330-334
- https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128903300521
Abstract
Four input devices were compared in a data entry task by speed and accuracy scores. The input devices were: Linus pen (a handwriting recognition system), optical mouse, cursor keys, and alphabetic keys on a keyboard. Data entry consisted of twenty 5-letter words and 100 single letters. Two different screen designs (QWERTY and ALPHA) were used for the mouse and cursor keys conditions. Results showed the keyboard to be fastest and the cursor keys to be slowest in data entry. The mouse and Linus pen had comparable latency scores. Overall, five-letter words were entered faster than five single letters. Latency decreased over trials, and ALPHA conditions required more time than QWERTY conditions. The Linus pen was the least accurate input device. The cursor QWERTY condition produced the highest accuracy scores for letter entry while the keyboard produced the highest accuracy scores for word entry.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Speed of response using keyboard and screen-based microcomputer response mediaInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1985
- The Effect of Graphic Input Devices on Performance in a Cursor Positioning TaskProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1982
- The effect of graphic input devices on performance in a cursor positioning taskPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1982
- Evaluation of Mouse, Rate-Controlled Isometric Joystick, Step Keys, and Text Keys for Text Selection on a CRTErgonomics, 1978
- Cursor Positioning on an Electronic Display Using Lightpen, Lightgun, or Keyboard for Three Basic TasksHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1975