Reply to the Comment on “Rate Coefficient Measurements of the Reaction CH3 + O2 = CH3O + O”
- 11 October 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Vol. 104 (43), 9803-9805
- https://doi.org/10.1021/jp994496m
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reply to Comment on “Rate Constants for CH3 + O2 → CH3O + O at High Temperature and Evidence for H2CO + O2 → HCO + HO2”The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2000
- Comment on “Rate Constants for CH3 + O2 → CH3O + O at High Temperature and Evidence for H2CO + O2 → HCO + HO2” and “Rate Coefficient Measurements of the Reaction CH3 + O2 = CH3O + O”The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2000
- Rate Coefficient Measurements of the Reaction CH3 + O2 = CH3O + OThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 1999
- Rate Constants for CH3 + O2 → CH3O + O at High Temperature and Evidence for H2CO + O2 → HCO + HO2The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 1999
- Optimization and analysis of large chemical kinetic mechanisms using the solution mapping method—combustion of methaneProgress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1992
- A shock tube study of DF dissociationThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1983
- Consistency of theory and experiment in the ethane–methyl radical systemInternational Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 1981
- Shock-tube chemistry. 1. The laminar-to-turbulent boundary layer transitionThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1977
- Shock tube measurements of specific reaction rates in the branched chain CH4−CO−O2 systemSymposium (International) on Combustion, 1975
- The Interaction of a Reflected Shock Wave with the Boundary Layer in a Shock TubeBulletin of JSME, 1974