Comparison of Iontophoresis of Lidocaine with a Eutectic Mixture of Lidocaine and Prilocaine (EMLA) for Topically Administered Local Anesthesia
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology
- Vol. 20 (9), 579-583
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1994.tb00150.x
Abstract
Background. Almost all dermatologic surgery is accomplished using local anesthesia. To make our patients more comfortable, there is a constant search for less painful methods of administering anesthetic agents. Topical EMLA as well as iontophoresis are both useful in this regard. objective. In this study we compared topical EMM with lidocaine delivered by iontophoresis in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Our goal was to assess the degree of anesthesia obtained as well as the relative rapidity of onset. methods. A double-blind controlled study was performed on 10 healthy volunteers between 26 and 37 years of age. Three test sites were placed on each forearm. EMLA or a moisturizer control was placed on two of the three test sites on each arm. Each site was wiped free of cream and tested for sensitivity to pinprick 30 and 60 minutes after cream placement. One iontophoretic unit was placed on each forearm. Both units were saturated with anesthesia with the control unit being turned off. Sensitivity to pinprick was evaluated at the iontophoretic sites and one of the EMLA sites 30 minutes after site placement on the subject. The additional EMLA-treated site was tested in the same manner 60 minutes after placement. results. Both EMM cream and the iontophoretic unit delivered topical anesthesia greater than the control. Significantly more anesthesia was acquired 1 hour after application of EMM than was seen 30 minutes earlier. The iontophoretic patch-treated area provided greater anesthesia than the EMLA-treated sites evaluated 30 and 60 minutes after placement. Both modalities provided significant anesthesia when left in place for 60 minutes. conclusion. Both iontophoresis of lidocaine and topical EMM delivered significant, and sometimes complete, local anesthesia. A greater degree of anesthesia is delivered via iontophoresis after 30 minutes as compared with EMLA left on the skin for 30 or 60 minutes. Both modalities have important and unique advantages and disadvantages. Topical EMM and iontophoretically delivered lidocaine are both valuable tools for the dermatologic surgeon.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Crème analgésique EMLA pour la ponction veineuse lors de l'induction anesthésique chez l'enfantAnnales Françaises dʼAnesthésie et de Réanimation, 1992
- Local Anesthesia Obtained via Iontophoresis as an Aid to Shave BiopsyArchives of Dermatology, 1992
- EMLA for laser treatment of portwine stains in childrenLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 1992
- Iontophoresis versus subcutaneous injection: a comparison of two methods of local anesthesia delivery in childrenPain, 1991
- A Comparative Study of Topical Analgesia with a Lidocaine/ Prilocaine Cream (EMLA A) and Infiltration Anesthesia for Laser Surgery of Genital Warts in MenSexually Transmitted Diseases, 1990
- Emla for Pain Relief During Arterial CannulationUpsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 1990
- Painless cauterization of spider veins with the use of iontophoretic local anesthesiaJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1988
- Laser-Induced Pain for Evaluation of Local AnalgesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1988
- Iontophoresis in dermatologyJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1986