Mortality After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
- 1 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 254 (5), 738-744
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31823604ac
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to identify risk factors of postoperative 30-day mortality (POM) after colorectal cancer resection. Summary: Meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate any significant benefit of laparoscopy in terms of postoperative mortality. This could be explained by the lack of a large sample size. Methods: All patients who underwent colorectal resection for cancer between 2006 and 2008 in France were included. Data were extracted from the French National Health Service Database. A multivariate analysis evaluating risk factors for POM was performed including the following factors: age, gender, tumor location, associated comorbidities, emergency surgery, synchronous liver metastasis, malnutrition, and surgical approach. Results: During the 3-year period, a total of 84,524 colorectal resections for colorectal cancer were performed: 22,359 through laparoscopy (26%) and 62,165 through laparotomy (74%). From 2006 to 2008, laparoscopic approach rate increased from 23% to 29% (P < 0.001). POM was 5.0%: 2% after laparoscopy and 6% after laparotomy (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, 7 independent factors were significantly associated with a higher POM: age 70 years or more [P < 0.001, odds ratio (OR): 3.28; (3.00–3.59)], respiratory comorbidity [P < 0.001, OR: 3.16; (2.91–3.37)], vascular comorbidity [P < 0.001, OR: 2.66; (2.48–2.85)], neurologic comorbidity [P < 0.001, OR: 1.78; (1.51–2.09)], emergency surgery [P < 0.001, OR: 2.68; (2.48–2.90)], synchronous liver metastasis [P < 0.001, OR: 2.63; (2.41–2.86)], and preoperative malnutrition [OR: 1.33; (1.19–1.50)]. Laparoscopic surgery [P < 0.001, OR: 0.59; (0.54–0.65)] was independently associated with a significant decreased POM. Conclusions: This all-inclusive national study showed that POM after colorectal cancer surgery is significantly reduced in case of age less than 70 years, elective surgery, and absence of synchronous liver metastasis, malnutrition, respiratory, neurologic, or vascular comorbidity. Furthermore, it is suggested that a laparoscopic surgery is independently associated with a decreased POM. This result, observed at a national level, must be considered when choosing the best surgical approach for colorectal cancer treatment.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Laparoscopic Colectomy for Cancer Is Not Inferior to Open Surgery Based on 5-Year Data From the COST Study Group TrialAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Laparoscopic Resection in Rectal Cancer Patients: Outcome and Cost-Benefit AnalysisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2007
- Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2005
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002