Discrepancies Between the Upper Limit of Vulnerability and Defibrillation Threshold:
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 14 (7), 728-732
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02523.x
Abstract
Upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) has a strong correlation with defibrillation threshold (DFT) in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Significant discrepancies between ULV and DFT are infrequent. The aim of this study was to characterize patients with such discrepancies. The ULV and DFT were determined in 167 ICD patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate clinical predictors of a significant difference (> or =10 J) between ULV and DFT. Only 8 patients (5%) had > or =10 J difference. ULV exceeded DFT in all of them. Absence of coronary artery disease (6/8 vs 48/159 patients; P = 0.05) and absence of documented ventricular arrhythmias (4/8 vs 12/159 patients; P = 0.01) were the only independent predictors of a significant ULV-DFT discrepancy. Significant discrepancies between ULV and DFT occur in 5% of patients with ICDs. Absence of coronary disease and documented ventricular arrhythmias predict such a discrepancy. At ICD implant, DFT testing is recommended in these patients and in patients with a high (>20 J) ULV before first-shock energy and the need for lead repositioning are determined.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Upper Limit of Vulnerability Predicts Chronic Defibrillation Threshold for Transvenous Implantable DefibrillatorsJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1997
- Effects of the Pacing Site, Procainamide, and Lead Configuration on the Relationship Between the Upper Limit of Vulnerability and the Defibrillation ThresholdPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- Epicardial and Nonthoracotomy Defibrillation Lead Systems Combined with a Cardioverter DefibrillatorPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- Hemodynamic deterioration during ICD implant: Predictors of high-risk patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1994
- Importance of abortive shock capability with electrogram storage in cardioverter-defibrillator devicesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Factors Associated with Implantation‐Related ComplicationsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
- Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Defibrillation threshold testing: Necessary but evil?American Heart Journal, 1989
- The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Clinical experience, complications, and follow-up in 25 patientsArchives of Internal Medicine, 1988
- Studies of ventricular fibrillation caused by electric shockAmerican Heart Journal, 1930