Combination chemotherapy versus single agents followed by combination chemotherapy in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 7 (11), 1602-1613
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1989.7.11.1602
Abstract
During the last decade, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) has studied a series of combination chemotherapy regimens in metastatic (stage IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In January 1984, the ECOG activated a randomized study, EST 1583, which concluded the evaluation of combination regimens in phase III trials and initiated the evaluation of single agents exclusively in previously untreated patients. The treatment regimens in EST 1583 consisted of: (1) mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP); (2) vinblastine and cisplatin (VP); (3) MVP alternating with the regimen cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and procarbazine (CAMP); (4) carboplatin followed by the MVP regimen at the time of progression; and (5) iproplatin followed by MVP at the time of progression, from January 1984 to July 1985, 743 patients were entered on this trial and 699 fulfilled the eligibility requirements. The following objective responses rates (complete plus partial remissions) were observed: first-line MVP, 20%; VP, 13%; MVP/CAMP, 13%; carboplatin, 9%; iproplatin, 6%; and secondline MVP, 6%. First-line MVP produced a significantly higher response rate than the other treatments (P = .03) adjusted for prognostic variables. Using analyses that were adjusted for prognostic covariates, survival for patients treated on a given regimen was compared with survival for all remaining patients. These analyses showed that treatment with carboplatin was associated with longer survival (median survival time, 31.7 weeks; P = .008) while initial treatment with MVP was associated with a trend for shorter survival (median survival time, 22.7 weeks; P = .09). It should be noted that none of these regimens appear to have produced a clinical meaningful prolongation of survival. Similar analyses evaluating time to progression disclosed that carboplatin-treated patients had a significantly longer time to progression (median time to progression, 29 weeks) than all remaining patients (P = .01). Life-threatening and lethal toxicities (toxicity grades 4 and 5) were greater on the combination regimens than on the single agents (P < .001). Based on these results, current group-wide ECOG trials in stage IV NSCLC consist of randomized phase II trials evaluating single agents.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of alternating combination chemotherapy on survival of ambulatory patients with metastatic large-cell and adenocarcinoma of the lung. A Southwest Oncology Group Study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986
- CISPLATIN AND VINBLASTINE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL-CARCINOMA FOLLOWED BY IRRADIATION IN PATIENTS WITH REGIONAL DISEASE1986
- RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING VINDESINE PLUS CISPLATIN WITH VINBLASTINE PLUS CISPLATIN IN PATIENTS WITH NON-SMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER, WITH AN ANALYSIS OF METHODS OF RESPONSE ASSESSMENT1985
- Chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma: EST 2575, generation V--a randomized comparison of four cisplatin-containing regimens.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985
- Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1982
- RATIONALE FOR THE USE OF ALTERNATING NON-CROSS-RESISTANT CHEMOTHERAPY1982
- Cisplatin and Vindesine Combination Chemotherapy for Advanced Carcinoma of the Lung: A Randomized Trial Investigating Two Dosage SchedulesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1981
- RESULTS OF A PHASE-II PROTOCOL FOR EVALUATION OF NEW CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC REGIMENS IN PATIENTS WITH INOPERABLE NON-SMALL CELL LUNG-CARCINOMA (EST-2575, GENERATION-I)1981
- CHEMOTHERAPY FOR METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL BRONCHOGENIC-CARCINOMA - EST 2575, GENERATION-III, HAM VERSUS CAMP1981
- A prospective randomized study of various irradiation doses and fractionation schedules in the treatment of inoperable non-oat-cell carcinoma of the lung. Preliminary report by the radiation therapy oncology groupCancer, 1980