Body Size and Risk of Colon and Rectal Cancer in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 5 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 98 (13), 920-931
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj246
Abstract
Background: Body weight and body mass index (BMI) are positively related to risk of colon cancer in men, whereas weak or no associations exist in women. This discrepancy may be related to differences in fat distribution between sexes or to the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in women. Methods: We used multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between anthropometric measures and risks of colon and rectal cancer among 368 277 men and women who were free of cancer at baseline from nine countries of the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: During 6.1 years of follow-up, we identified 984 and 586 patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively. Body weight and BMI were statistically significantly associated with colon cancer risk in men (highest versus lowest quintile of BMI, relative risk [RR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 2.15; Ptrend = .006) but not in women. In contrast, comparisons of the highest to the lowest quintile showed that several anthropometric measures, including waist circumference (men, RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.93; Ptrend = .001; women, RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.08 to 2.03; Ptrend = .008), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR; men, RR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.06 to 2.15; Ptrend = .006; women, RR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.12 to 2.05; Ptrend = .002), and height (men, RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.98; Ptrend = .04; women, RR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.30 to 2.46; Ptrend <.001) were related to colon cancer risk in both sexes. The estimated absolute risk of developing colon cancer within 5 years was 203 and 131 cases per 100 000 men and 129 and 86 cases per 100 000 women in the highest and lowest quintiles of WHR, respectively. Upon further stratification, no association of waist circumference and WHR with risk of colon cancer was observed among postmenopausal women who used HRT. None of the anthropometric measures was statistically significantly related to rectal cancer. Conclusions: Waist circumference and WHR, indicators of abdominal obesity, were strongly associated with colon cancer risk in men and women in this population. The association of abdominal obesity with colon cancer risk may vary depending on HRT use in postmenopausal women; however, these findings require confirmation in future studies.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Body size and breast cancer risk: Findings from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)International Journal of Cancer, 2004
- Effects of Conjugated Equine Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women With HysterectomyJAMA, 2004
- Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, and cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysisThe Lancet, 2004
- Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2002
- American Cancer Society Guidelines on Nutrition and Physical Activity for Cancer Prevention: Reducing the Risk of Cancer with Healthy Food Choices and Physical ActivityCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2002
- Methylation of the oestrogen receptor CpG island links ageing and neoplasia in human colonNature Genetics, 1994
- Compendium of Physical Activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activitiesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1993
- A prospective study of body mass, height, and smoking on the risk of colorectal cancer in womenCancer Causes & Control, 1991
- Body weight and physical activity as predictors of colorectal cancer riskNutrition and Cancer, 1990
- Impact of obesity on metabolism in men and women. Importance of regional adipose tissue distribution.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1983