Randomized Trial of Amifostine in Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy and Hyperfractionated Radiation: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 98-01
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (10), 2145-2154
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.07.167
Abstract
Purpose To test the ability of the cytoprotectant, amifostine, to reduce chemoradiotherapy-induced esophagitis and evaluate its influence on quality of life (QOL) and swallowing symptoms. Patients and Methods A total of 243 patients with stage II to IIIA/B non–small-cell lung cancer received induction paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 22 and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) days 1 and 22, followed by concurrent weekly paclitaxel (50 mg/m2 IV) and carboplatin (AUC 2), and hyperfractionated radiation therapy (69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy bid). Patients were randomly assigned at registration to amifostine (AM) 500 mg IV four times per week or no AM during chemoradiotherapy. Beyond standard toxicity end points, physician dysphagia logs (PDLs), daily patient swallowing diaries, and QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30/LC-13) were also collected. Swallowing AUC analyses were calculated from patient diaries and PDLs. Results A total of 120 patients were randomly assigned to receive AM, and 122, to receive no AM (one patient was ineligible); 72% received AM per protocol or with a minor deviation. AM was associated with higher rates of acute nausea (P = .03), vomiting (P = .007), cardiovascular toxicity (P = .0001), and infection or febrile neutropenia (P = .03). The rate of ≥ grade 3 esophagitis was 30% with AM versus 34% without AM (P = .9). Patient diaries demonstrated lower swallowing dysfunction AUC with amifostine (z test P = .025). QOL was not significantly different between the two arms, except for pain, which showed more clinically meaningful improvement and less deterioration at 6 weeks follow-up (v pretreatment) in the AM arm (P = .003). The median survival rates for both arms were comparable (AM, 17.3 v no AM, 17.9 months; P = .87). Conclusion AM did not significantly reduce esophagitis ≥ grade 3 in patients receiving hyperfractionated radiation and chemotherapy. However, patient self-assessments suggested a possible advantage to AM that is being explored with modified dosing route strategies.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- O-125 ECOG 2597: Phase III study of induction chemotherapy followed by standard thoracic radiotherapy (STD TRT) vs hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) for patients with unresectable stage III A & B non-small cell lung cancerLung Cancer, 2003
- Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Combined Modality Treatment With or Without Amifostine in Unresectable Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Sequential vs. concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Analysis of failures in a phase III study (RTOG 9410)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2000
- Poster sessionsAnnals of Oncology, 1996
- The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trialsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1994
- Sample size calculations for ordered categorical dataStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Comparison of a Standard Regimen (CHOP) with Three Intensive Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test ProceduresJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1972
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958