Two-Stage Testing in Microarray Analysis: What Is Gained?
Open Access
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
- Vol. 57 (5), B189-B192
- https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/57.5.b189
Abstract
Microarray technology for gene expression studies offers powerful new technology for understanding changes in gene expression as a function of other observable or manipulable variables. However, microarrays also pose a number of new challenges. One of the most prominent of these is the difficulty in establishing a procedure for declaring whether a gene's expression level is associated with the independent variable that offers reasonable and specifiable false-positive (type 1 error) and false-negative (type 2 error) rates. A recent article described a two-stage testing procedure to address these goals. However, information was not provided to indicate whether this procedure would or would not meet its objectives. Herein, we show mathematically that the two-stage procedure proposed does not provide benefits in terms of minimizing false-negatives while controlling the false-positive rate relative to standard single-stage testing. Therefore, investigators are encouraged to consider alternative analytic approaches.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Letters to the EditorThe Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2001
- Microarray Profiling of Gene Expression in Aging and Its Alteration by Caloric Restriction in MiceJournal of Nutrition, 2001
- Interpretation, Design, and Analysis of Gene Array Expression ExperimentsThe Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2001
- Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: Statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000
- Generation of patterns from gene expression data by assigning confidence to differentially expressed genesBioinformatics, 2000
- Statistics notes: Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni methodBMJ, 1995
- Statistical significance in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin, 1968