Airway responsiveness to histamine in man: effect of atropine on in vivo and in vitro comparison.
- 1 April 1985
- Vol. 40 (4), 261-267
- https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.40.4.261
Abstract
Airway responsiveness to histamine in man may be determined by the smooth muscle sensitivity to histamine or to the interaction between vagal nerve input and smooth muscle sensitivity. In vivo responsiveness to histamine was compared with in vitro smooth muscle sensitivity to histamine in 20 non-asthmatic patients and one asthmatic patient undergoing thoracic surgery. Histamine responsiveness was assessed in the first 10 non-asthmatics without atropine pretreatment, in the second 10 after atropine pretreatment, and in the asthmatic patient both with and without atropine. In vivo responsiveness was also measured in 10 normal subjects and 10 asthmatic patients not undergoing surgery. Results were expressed as the provocation concentration (PC) causing a decrease in FEV1 [forced expiratory volume in 1 s] of 20% (PC20FEV1) and in specific airways conductance of 35% (PC35sGaw), and in terms of maximal expiratory flow at 35% vital capacity, measured from the partial (V35(P)) and complete (V35(C)) flow volume curves of 35% (PC35V35(P); PC35V35(C)). In vitro smooth muscle sensitivity to histamine of bronchial tissue obtained at thoracotomy was expressed as the concentration causing a 50% maximum contraction (EC50) and as the maximum tension generated. There was considerable variation between patients in the in vivo responsiveness but a relatively narrow range for in vitro responses. There was no significant correlation between in vivo responsiveness, either with or without atropine pretreatment, and in vitro results. The asthmatic patient showed hyperresponsiveness in vivo but not in vitro. In vitro airway smooth muscle sensitivity to histamine is not the sole determinant of in vivo airway responsiveness and that this lack of relationship is not explained by the influence of vagal nerve input on in vivo measurements. The results in the asthmatic patient suggest that airway hyperresponsiveness may be an in vivo phenomenon which is not related to a primary abnormality of airway smooth muscle.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of in vivo airway responsiveness and in vitro smooth muscle sensitivity to methacholine in man.Thorax, 1984
- Prolonged asthmatic responses to inhaled methacholineJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1983
- Comparison of bronchial responses to prostaglandin F and methacholineJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1981
- Effect of inhaled H1 and H2 receptor antagonist in normal and asthmatic subjects.Thorax, 1980
- Bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine and exerciseJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1979
- Reproducibility and comparison of responses to inhaled histamine and methacholine.Thorax, 1978
- Inhaled antihistamines--bronchodilatation and effects on histamine- and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.Thorax, 1978
- AIRWAYS OBSTRUCTION BEFORE AND AFTER ISOPRENALINE, HISTAMINE, AND PREDNISOLONE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE BRONCHITISThe Lancet, 1968
- Role of Autonomic Nervous System and the Cough Reflex in the Increased Responsiveness of Airways in Patients with Obstructive Airway Disease*Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1967
- A NEW METHOD FOR MEASURING AIRWAY RESISTANCE IN MAN USING A BODY PLETHYSMOGRAPH: VALUES IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND IN PATIENTS WITH RESPIRATORY DISEASE 1Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1956