Choice of time‐scale in Cox's model analysis of epidemiologic cohort data: a simulation study
Top Cited Papers
- 6 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 23 (24), 3803-3820
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2098
Abstract
Cox's regression model is widely used for assessing associations between potential risk factors and disease occurrence in epidemiologic cohort studies. Although age is often a strong determinant of disease risk, authors have frequently used time‐on‐study instead of age as the time‐scale, as for clinical trials. Unless the baseline hazard is an exponential function of age, this approach can yield different estimates of relative hazards than using age as the time‐scale, even when age is adjusted for. We performed a simulation study in order to investigate the existence and magnitude of bias for different degrees of association between age and the covariate of interest. Age to disease onset was generated from exponential, Weibull or piecewise Weibull distributions, and both fixed and time‐dependent dichotomous covariates were considered. We observed no bias upon using age as the time‐scale. Upon using time‐on‐study, we verified the absence of bias for exponentially distributed age to disease onset. For non‐exponential distributions, we found that bias could occur even when the covariate of interest was independent from age. It could be severe in case of substantial association with age, especially with time‐dependent covariates. These findings were illustrated on data from a cohort of 84329 French women followed prospectively for breast cancer occurrence. In view of our results, we strongly recommend not using time‐on‐study as the time‐scale for analysing epidemiologic cohort data. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
Funding Information
- Fondation de France (2002009738)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modelling age-specific risk: application to dementiaStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52 705 women with breast cancer and 108 411 women without breast cancerThe Lancet, 1997
- E3N, a French cohort study on cancer risk factorsEuropean Journal Of Cancer Prevention, 1997
- Dose-Response and Trend Analysis in EpidemiologyEpidemiology, 1995
- Model inconsistency, illustrated by the cox proportional hazards modelStatistics in Medicine, 1995
- Cox Analysis of Survival Data with Non-Proportional Hazard FunctionsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1992
- The impact of heterogeneity on the comparison of survival timesStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariatesBiometrika, 1984
- Multiplicative Models and Cohort AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983