Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 5 May 2000
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 82 (11), 1783-1788
- https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1142
Abstract
This paper reports on the reasons why patients agreed to or declined entry into randomized trials of cancer following discussions conducted by clinicians in both District General and University Hospitals. Two hundred and four patients completed a 16-item questionnaire following the consultation, of these 112 (55%) were women with breast cancer. Overall results showed that 147 (72.1%) patients accepted entry to a randomized clinical trial (RCT). The main reasons nominated for participating in a trial were that ‘others will benefit’ (23.1%) and ‘trust in the doctor’ (21.1%). One of the main reasons for declining trial entry was that patients were ‘worried about randomization’ (19.6%). There was a significantly higher acceptance rate for trials providing active treatment in every arm 98 (80.6%) compared with those trials with a no treatment arm 46 (60.5%), χ2test P = 0.003. The study outlines a number of factors that appear to influence a patient’s decision to accept or decline entry into an RCT of cancer therapy. An important factor is whether or not the trial offers active treatment in all arms of the study. Communication that promotes trust and confidence in the doctor is also a powerful motivating influence. © 2000 Cancer Research CampaignKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- How do doctors explain randomised clinical trials to their patients?European Journal Of Cancer, 1999
- Is recruitment more difficult with a placebo arm in randomised controlled trials? A quasirandomised, interview based studyBMJ, 1999
- Attitudes of patients to randomised clinical trials of cancer therapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1998
- Original articleThe Breast, 1996
- Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1996
- Conducting clinical research in the new NHS: the model of cancerBMJ, 1994
- New approach for recruitment into randomised controlled trialsThe Lancet, 1993
- Offering the Option of Randomized Clinical Trials to Cancer Patients Who Overestimate Their Prognoses with Standard TherapiesCancer Investigation, 1993
- Accrual to cancer clinical trials: Directions from the research literatureSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Participation in a clinical trial: The patients' point of viewControlled Clinical Trials, 1985