Ordinal Judgments and Summation of Nonvisible Sets of Food Items by Two Chimpanzees and a Rhesus Macaque.
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
- Vol. 31 (3), 351-362
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.31.3.351
Abstract
Two chimpanzees and a rhesus macaque rapidly learned the ordinal relations between 5 colors of containers (plastic eggs) when all containers of a given color contained a specific number of identical food items. All 3 animals also performed at high levels when comparing sets of containers with sets of visible food items. This indicates that the animals learned the approximate quantity of food items in containers of a given color. However, all animals failed in a summation task, in which a single container was compared with a set of 2 containers of a lesser individual quantity but a greater combined quantity. This difficulty was not overcome by sequential presentation of containers into opaque receptacles, but performance improved if the quantitative difference between sizes was very large.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancyCognition, 2004
- Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) Respond to Nonvisible Sets After One-by-One Addition and Removal of Items.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2004
- Numerity of a socially housed hamadryas baboon (Papio hamadryas) and a socially housed squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2003
- "Constructive" enumeration by chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) on a computerized taskAnimal Cognition, 2001
- A comparison of the Rescorla-Wagner and Pearce models in a negative patterning and a summation problemLearning & Behavior, 2001
- Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2000
- Summation of symbols by pigeons (Columba livia): The importance of number and mass of reward items.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2000
- Stroop-Like Effects for Monkeys and Humans: Processing Speed or Strength of Association?Psychological Science, 1994
- Starting to add worse: Effects of learning to multiply on children's additionCognition, 1990
- Selection of Food by Size in the Chimpanzee, and Comparison with Human JudgmentsScience, 1960