Screening for light‐for‐gestational age infants: a comparison of three simple measurements
- 1 March 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 94 (3), 217-221
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02357.x
Abstract
Fundal height, abdominal girth and abdominal length were measured during routine examination in our antenatal clinic. Standard graphs of fundal height, abdominal girth and the ratio of fundal height to abdominal length were drawn using data from 250 consecutive women with uncomplicated pregnancies. These graphs were used to predict low-birthweight-for-gestation (LGA) in 150 high-risk and 208 low-risk pregnancies. Fundal height measurements had high sensitivity (78-84%) and specificity (84-88%) and were therefore most reliable in screening for LGA babies.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of fundal height as a screening test for fetal growth retardationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982
- Antenatal detection of growth retardation: actual practice in a large maternity hospitalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982
- PREDICTION OF SMALL‐FOR‐DATES INFANTS BY MEASUREMENT OF SYMPHYSIAL‐FUNDAL‐HEIGHTBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1981
- IS ROUTINE ANTENATAL CARE WORTH WHILE?The Lancet, 1980
- Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: Measurement of uterine heightAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1978
- Gravidogram and Fetal Growth:Comparison with Biochemical SupervisionActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1977
- CLINICAL FOETAL WEIGHT PREDICTIONBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1967