Exenatide compared with long‐acting insulin to achieve glycaemic control with minimal weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the Helping Evaluate Exenatide in patients with diabetes compared with Long‐Acting insulin (HEELA) study
Open Access
- 10 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
- Vol. 11 (12), 1153-1162
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01154.x
Abstract
Aim: The Helping Evaluate Exenatide in overweight patients with diabetes compared with Long‐Acting insulin (HEELA) study was designed to examine whether the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonist, exenatide, could improve HbA1c (≤7.4%) with minimal weight gain (≤1 kg) compared with insulin glargine. Methods: Patients [body mass index (BMI) >27 kg/m2] with elevated cardiovascular risk and type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on two or three oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) were randomized to add‐on exenatide 5–10 μg b.i.d. (n = 118) or insulin glargine o.d. (titrated to target fasting plasma glucose ≤5.6 mmol/l; n = 117) for 26 weeks. Results: The study population had baseline mean (s.d.) age of 56.5 (9.1) years and BMI of 34.1 (5.3) kg/m2, and 58.5% of patients were taking two OADs. Mean baseline HbA1c was 8.65 (0.68)% in the exenatide group and 8.48 (0.66)% in the insulin glargine group. The proportions of patients achieving the composite endpoint of HbA1c ≤7.4% with weight gain ≤1 kg were 53.4% for the exenatide group and 19.8% for the insulin glargine group (p < 0.001 for exenatide vs. insulin glargine). Exenatide and insulin glargine did not demonstrate a significant difference in HbA1c improvements [least square (LS) mean [s.e.m.]: −1.25 [0.09]% and −1.26 [0.09]% respectively; p = 0.924], but had divergent effects on body weight (−2.73 [0.31] vs. +2.98 [0.31] kg respectively, p < 0.001) after 26 weeks. There were more treatment‐related adverse events with exenatide but a lower incidence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia, with no differences in overall or severe hypoglycaemia. Conclusions: Additional treatment with exenatide resulted in significantly more overweight and obese patients with an elevated cardiovascular risk and type 2 diabetes achieving better glycaemic control with minimal weight gain compared with insulin glargine.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2009Diabetes Care, 2009
- Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Effect of a Multifactorial Intervention on Mortality in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Effects of exenatide versus insulin analogues on weight change in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a pooled post-hoc analysisCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2008
- ExenatideDrugs, 2007
- A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority studyDiabetologia, 2006
- Glycemic Durability of Rosiglitazone, Metformin, or Glyburide MonotherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- A One-year, Randomised, Multicentre Trial Comparing Insulin Glargine with NPH Insulin in Combination with Oral Agents in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesHormone and Metabolic Research, 2003
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998