Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 20 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 109 (1), 123-139
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9632-6
Abstract
Risk factors for the newly identified “intrinsic” breast cancer subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, basal-like and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive/estrogen receptor-negative) were determined in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, a population-based, case–control study of African-American and white women. Immunohistochemical markers were used to subtype 1,424 cases of invasive and in situ breast cancer, and case subtypes were compared to 2,022 controls. Luminal A, the most common subtype, exhibited risk factors typically reported for breast cancer in previous studies, including inverse associations for increased parity and younger age at first full-term pregnancy. Basal-like cases exhibited several associations that were opposite to those observed for luminal A, including increased risk for parity and younger age at first term full-term pregnancy. Longer duration breastfeeding, increasing number of children breastfed, and increasing number of months breastfeeding per child were each associated with reduced risk of basal-like breast cancer, but not luminal A. Women with multiple live births who did not breastfeed and women who used medications to suppress lactation were at increased risk of basal-like, but not luminal A, breast cancer. Elevated waist-hip ratio was associated with increased risk of luminal A in postmenopausal women, and increased risk of basal-like breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women. The prevalence of basal-like breast cancer was highest among premenopausal African-American women, who also showed the highest prevalence of basal-like risk factors. Among younger African-American women, we estimate that up to 68% of basal-like breast cancer could be prevented by promoting breastfeeding and reducing abdominal adiposity.Keywords
This publication has 88 references indexed in Scilit:
- Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)‐negative, progesterone receptor (PR)‐negative, and HER2‐negative invasive breast cancer, the so‐called triple‐negative phenotypeCancer, 2007
- Differences in Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes in a Population-Based StudyCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2007
- Clinicopathologic significance of the basal-like subtype of breast cancer: a comparison with hormone receptor and Her2/neu-overexpressing phenotypesHuman Pathology, 2006
- Concordance among Gene-Expression–Based Predictors for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Race, Breast Cancer Subtypes, and Survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer StudyJAMA, 2006
- High‐throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well‐characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analysesInternational Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Body size and breast cancer risk: Findings from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)International Journal of Cancer, 2004
- Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data setsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003
- Metastasis genes: A progression puzzleNature, 2002
- Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implicationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001