Does the Catford drum give an accurate assessment of acuity?
Open Access
- 1 September 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 65 (9), 652-656
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.65.9.652
Abstract
Adult emmetropes and myopes were tested with the Catford drum and the results compared with subjective (Landolt C) acuity. For he emmetropes the Catford drum was found to overestimate visual acuity by a factor of approximately 4. For myopes, and emmetropes viewing through plus lenses, the discrepancies were much larger. Since the Catford drum not only overestimates acuity but will do so by a factor which varies for different visual disorders, caution is needed in clinical interpretation of results obtained with it.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contrast sensitivity assessment of functional amblyopia in humans.1979
- The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1978
- Measurement of infant visual acuity from pattern reversal evoked potentialsVision Research, 1978
- Visual acuity in human infants: A review and comparison of behavioral and electrophysiological studiesVision Research, 1978
- SPATIO-TEMPORAL INTERACTIONS IN ANISOMETROPIC AND STRABISMIC AMBLYOPIA1977
- The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classificationVision Research, 1977
- Visual contrast sensitivity of a 6-month-old infant Measured by the evoked potentialNature, 1976
- THE MEASUREMENT OF SPATIAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN CASES OF BLURRED VISION ASSOCIATED WITH CEREBRAL LESIONSBrain, 1976
- Subjective and Objective Visual Acuity Testing TechniquesArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1976
- Development of visual acuityArchives of Disease in Childhood, 1973