Non‐conventional therapies in childhood cancer: Guidelines for distinguishing non‐harmful from harmful therapies: A report of the SIOP Working Committee on Psychosocial Issues in Pediatric Oncology
- 29 October 2003
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Blood & Cancer
- Vol. 42 (1), 106-108
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.10418
Abstract
This is the 11th official document of the SIOP Working Committee on Psychosocial Issues in Pediatric Oncology, instituted in 1991. There is a tendency for some physicians to make blanket statements against the use of non‐proven, non‐conventional therapies, even when these therapies are not harmful. There is an equal and opposite tendency on the part of many parents to do all that they possibly can for their children, including using any non‐conventional therapy they feel might do some good. The health care team must open a healthy dialogue with parents that will lead to a clear distinction between those complementary therapies that are harmful and those that are not, indeed, might even be helpful psychologically if not therapeutically.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Staying on the Ethical High Ground with Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe Nurse Practitioner, 2002
- Communication between physicians and cancer patients about complementary and alternative medicine: exploring patients' perspectivesPsycho‐Oncology, 2002
- Potential Physician Malpractice Liability Associated with Complementary and Integrative Medical TherapiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- CorrespondenceComplementary Therapies in Medicine, 2001
- Hematologic complications of alternative remedies.International Journal of Hematology, 2001